Since we will spend two weeks in Briançon for my ‘Tour de France 2017’, it’s clear that only two Marmots on the menu is not going to get me through those 🙂
As I have previously written, there are a lot of cols to be found in the area, so I had no difficulties in constructing a ‘Tour de France Road Book’ that made me shit my pants.
However, despite my normal lack of restraint, resulting in grossly overestimating myself, I had to promise Paula that for this year’s tour, I would at least try to cut myself some slack.
After all, I recently turned 57, which by itself may not be enough of an excuse to go easy on yourself.
But coupled with the slightly discomforting physical problems as the result of several crashes, I might actually be inclined to keep my promise…
So, with that in mind, I present you a first draft of the stages I’m planning to ride!
If attempted, the two Marmotte rides will have to be about a week apart and I would like to get used to the altitude before I take on either.
Depending on our time of arrival, I’m planning on a prologue of my Tour de France 2017 that will either take me up and down the Lautaret, or to Bardonecchia and back, over the Echelle.
Going up the Lautaret, Paula will have to block the road further up to the Galibier, because I may well forget my good intentions and push myself into taking on that steep final too.
The Lautaret itself (2,057 m, 27.7 kilometers, 3.1%) is almost false flat – for pros anyway – up to le Casset, but even during the final 7 to 8 kilometers, the grades rarely exceed 7%.
The only thing that might make that difficult, is a (strong) head wind, because that part is open and – like the whole climb – pretty straight (no hairpins).
The Echelle (1,768 m / 20 km / 2.2%) is even more false flat, up to the final 4 kilometers, which average some 6%, with a maximum of 9%.
From Bardonecchia, it offers more of a challenge: 8.8 kilometers at a 5.4% average, with 2 kilometers at 7%…
As I will definitely do the Lautaret with the final up the Galibier anyway, I think the Echelle might be the best choice for today.
This is going to be a bit more challenging, going up the Izoard.
I will probably be able to resist the urge to extend that to a return trip to Guillestre, as I’m planning on tackling the Izoard from the other end in another stage later on anyway.
The Izoard will be the first col well over 2,000 meters, with its summit at 2,360 meters.
From Briançon, the climb is 19.1 kilometers long, at an average grade of 6%.
While that may seem moderate, it is very much like the other end: tougher than it looks.
The first 4 kilometers or so, the average is around 5.8% after which there’s a short flat / downhill of about 1.5 kilometers.
The next 6 kilometers are a little irregular, with alternating slopes between 2% and 7.5%, averaging 4.5%.
However, I will have to preserve my ‘strength’ for the final 7.5 kilometers, when the grades will hardly drop below 8%…
Note to self: the road to Les Fonds de Cervières – a left turn onto the D89T at Cervières – might be worth exploring too.
This is a 21 kilometer long ascend from Briançon, or just over 10 km from the split with the Izoard, with some 900 meters – or about 400 from Cervières – of elevation difference…
Time for a longer effort…
For this stage, I’m thinking of tackling the other end of the Izoard, going from Briançon to Guillestre via the western approach, instead of over the Izoard.
This would be the ‘Medio Fondo’ of the Granfondo Serre Chevalier.
I’ve climbed the Izoard in 2014, starting in Châteaux Queyras.
From Guillestre up to the split close to that village (D947/D902), you have covered 20 kilometers with a modest elevation difference of less than 400 meters.
While this bit of false flat may not seem like much of a challenge, it’s 20 kilometers long and then the real climb still has to come.
From the split, the remainder is just over 14 kilometers with over 1,000 meters of elevation gain.
That’s over 7% average as it is, but the hard part only starts after you leave the valley, near Brunisard.
The next 4.5 – 5 kilometers to the Casse Deserte are 9.3% average and the remaining 2 after the short descend through the Casse are 8.3%…
Plan B for today: as the GF Sestriere is on the menu for tomorrow, the wiser option for today may be the ‘Corto Fondo’.
It offers a nice – and shorter – alternative, but it would include another ascend of the Echelle from Bardonecchia – not a bad thing, but still.
Or, the Lautaret and Galibier could offer a good alternative.
Or, I could just ride the Izoard, take a rest day tomorrow and do the GF Sestriere the day after 🙂
Time for the first Marmotte!
The Gran Fondo Sestriere – a one time Marmotte event, dubbed ‘Marmotta’ on that occasion – was cancelled for this year.
The reason for that remains a bit foggy, but they say it will be back in 2018.
It (obviously) starts and finishes in Sestriere, but coming from from Briançon, it makes more sense to start in Cesana Torinese – from Sestriere to there is a 10 kilometer descend anyway.
The big climb in this Gran Fondo, is the Colle delle Finestre (2,176 m).
With 18 kilometers in length and an average of over 9%, including 7 kilometers of gravel road, this will be a very ‘interesting’ climb.
It’s not unlikely that I will take the shortcut home to Briançon, in the car, after I complete the first climb up to Sestriere after that…
Compared to the ascend of the Finestre, the climbs up to Sestriere (2,035 m) both seem like peanuts.
First ascend is from Usseaux: 19 kilometers, but at an average of 3.6% that almost looks like a recovery, which probably won’t feel like that anymore after the first 5 or so.
Besides, half of it is between 5% and 7%.
After that, the descend to Cesana Torinese, were the alternative road through Sauze di Cesana leads up to Sestriere again.
This climb is 11.5 kilometers long, at an average of 5.9% – it offers a few steep(er) stretches, but most of it is around the average.
Depending on how I feel and whether or not I had a rest day after stage 2 or 3, this will take me up the col de Vars (2,109 m).
I will get on my bike after a car transfer to somewhere near Guillestre, warm up for about 5 kilometers and then tackle the 19.2 kilometer long ascend.
I’ve done this col from the other end in 2014, which turned out to be a nasty ‘surprise’, at least the final 8 kilometers.
From Guillestre, the average is similar (5.8% compared to 5.6% from Jausiers) but there is a 4 kilometer stretch in the middle that is near flat.
The first 7 kilometers are the hardest at 8.1% and the final 7 kilometers average around 6.2%, the first 3 of those being the toughest at 7.5%.
If I’m up to it, I may go up to Risoul (1,855) after descending back towards Guillestre. But as that is another 13 kilometer long climb at 6.8%, with various 8% stretches, I might just save that for another day.
Note to self: Risoul could also easily be combined with the climb up the Izoard from Briançon, then descend to Guillestre and up to Risoul.
As tempting as going up the Colle del Sommeiller may look – and the Trentino would be able to handle that, with the right tires – I think I’ll look for something else 🙂
Paula would not be able to follow me with the team car, so I’d be out on my own. Not necessarily a bad thing, but if something happens up there, it may be a while before they find you.
Still, getting up to 3,000 meters… Damn.
Anyway, today might be a good day for the Col de Granon (2,413 m).
It will probably prove to be enough of a challenge: from le Villard Latté, some kilometers up the Lautaret from Briançon, it’s 11.5 kilometers long, with 1,000 meters of elevation gain, a healthy 8.8%…
However, only the first kilometer and one three kilometers further on are below that – everything else is actually (well) over 9%, with one kilometer at 11.5% and another at 10%.
It’s highly unlikely that I will have the energy left to also get up the Croix de Toulouse after that. I penciled it in for this stage, but it may actually be better to do that some other day.
This ‘Route du Poët Ollagnier’ is also referred to as ‘the 21 hairpins of Briançon’, a reference to the Alpe d’Huez. Its summit is at 1,962 meters and it is only 6.3 kilometers long – at 10%.
And that average is ‘only’ 10% because of the final kilometer being 8.2% – that kilometer is unpaved too by the way…
Today I will take it easy by going up to Montgenèvre, down to Cesana Torinese (or Oulx) and then back up again.
This col has its summit at 1,854 meters – from Briançon, it’s some 11 kilometers long, at a modest average of 4.8%.
As to la Vachette, 3 kilometers in, it’s mainly flat, the average from there is a little more challenging, at 6.3%.
It’s fairly even climb, with most of it between 6% and 7%.
From the other end, i.e. from Cesana Torinese, it’s about 8.2 kilometers long, at 5.5%. This climb offers a few steeper stretches at 9 and 10%.
Starting from Oulx adds just over 10 kilometers to the climb, but between Oulx and Cesana, the average is a not so challenging 2.8%…
Alternately, if I have not yet done that, today might be the day for that ride up the Lautaret and Galibier…
This stage would be a good time to ride the other Marmotte I have planned!
I have the choice to ride the original Marmotte Alpes or my own version.
The former will give me the chance to see if I could actually do that in ‘gold certificate’ time, but it would be best to have a one-night relocation to Bourg-d’Oisans if I do.
The transfer from Briançon to Bourg is at least 1.5 hours, but from experience I know it will most likely take longer than that.
As I would like to start my ride early, i.e. shortly after dawn or so, this would mean getting up ridiculously early 🙂
As an alternative to not starting in Bourg-d’Oisans and not finishing there – at the summit of Alpe d’Huez – I could start on the summit of the Lautaret, which would only be a 30 – 40 minutes transfer by car.
I then have the choice to ride ‘clockwise’ or ‘counterclockwise’.
Clockwise means going down to Bourg-d’Oisans, get up the Alpe d’Huez, go down to Allemont via Villard-Reculas and from there, follow the original route.
Instead of going up the Alpe d’Huez, I could opt to take the Col du Sarenne instead.
As the Alpe has been climbed nine times so far and the Sarenne has never been on my menu, that might actually be the more attractive option…
Counterclockwise, I would first get up the remainder of the Galibier, which is a lot harder to start with than a descend.
But there will be a lot of downhill after that too, only interrupted by a few kilometers of ascend between Valloire and the summit of the Télégraphe.
I would then get up the Croix de Fer from Saint-Jean-de-Maurienne, a climb that I remember well from my struggle in 2012. As a consolation, I can ride up to Alpe d’Huez via Villard-Reculas instead of the classic route. I’ve done that in 2012 too and it is actually not that much easier.
If I decide to ride the classic route, that will add some 8 kilometers and 220 meters of elevation to the trip.
Going down the Sarenne after either alternative, I would have to climb the 25 kilometer of the Lautaret from Le Freney-d’Oisans, which I have done in 2012 too…
All four alternatives are between 175 and 185 kilometers in length, with the elevation difference between 5,500 and 6,000 meters – while elevation is ‘Strava calculated’ and most likely not 100% accurate, it’s certain that any of them are every bit as challenging as the ‘classic’ Marmotte.
This stage will also require a car transfer first: either to Modane for the full length of Iseran, or to Susa for Mont Cenis and the Iseran from Lanslebourg. Either transfer is about 1 hour, but I’m leaning towards option two.
The Col de l’Iseran from Modane is a staggering 56 kilometer long, but the more interesting bit starts at Lanslebourg, at the foot of the Mont Cenis. And even from there, the 33 kilometer ascend has a 12 kilometer flat(-ish) section through the valley after the initial climb up la Madeleine.
Col du Mont Cenis (2,086 m) from Susa is a 30.3 kilometer long climb, but the final 7 of those are flat while your ride along the lake. Actually, before you reach the official summit sign, you will have been on a slightly higher altitude already.
The remaining 23 kilometers are at an average of 6.8%, so not that easy – considering the inevitable flatter bits, amounting to some 4 kilometers, the average is over 7% and most of it is 8%.
The Iseran from Lanslebourg is (still) 32 kilometers long. After the short climb up la Madeleine (6 km / 6%, with 1 km at 9.5%), the part to Bonneval features some ups-and-downs, but you will be at the same altitude by the time you get there.
From Bonneval, the ‘interesting’ bit of the Iseran starts: 13 kilometers at 7.5%, with two easy bits to re-catch your breath a bit, but otherwise offering 8% and over (max 9.5% over two 1 km stretches).
From the summit of the Iseran, it will be a long trip back to the apartment by car, but I do not see a good alternative to do some of it by bike. If the weather is nice and the wind not too strong, I might descend back to Lanslebourg, or even further to Modane, but I would then take the alternative ‘Route Panoramique’ from Sollières…
Other than the previously mentioned ‘may better save that for another day’ climbs, there are several options to consider.
After all, there are a lot of other climbs Iin the area to construct a(n alternative) stage – the list will be too long as always 🙂
5 thoughts on “Tour de France 2017 – Road Book”
let me know when you are there, maybe I come and ride le boucle d’Izoard with you!
Cool Kristof – I will try to remember that 👍
maybe better Paula makes note of that 😉
Good luck! Ride safely.
Thanks John, I will!
Comments are closed.